Sydney Grace came into her own at 1:35 PM on Friday, June 5, 2009. All are well--and home already. Love to you all.
Sunday, June 7, 2009
She arrives.
Sydney Grace came into her own at 1:35 PM on Friday, June 5, 2009. All are well--and home already. Love to you all.
Friday, May 29, 2009
Is Sotamayor a racist?
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Conservative Radio Host Gets Waterboarded
Honest question? What do people think about whether or not waterboarding is torture? Second question: whether it is or not, is it okay to use this technique to get information?
Enjoy the weekend, everyone!
Monday, April 6, 2009
What's Going On?
Anybody in the area heard anything?
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Tough News
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Nick Marino--Local Boy Makes Good
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Ode to a Grecian Lush
Thursday, January 15, 2009
This blew my f'ing mind...
I had a number of thoughts about this (ambivelence about human genius and destruction, the insanity of religions based on anthropomorphic gods, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist's "Atomic Clock" approaching midnight, etc.)
What does it make you think about?
Friday, January 9, 2009
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Rhode Island it’s neither a road nor an island – discuss.
I still think we’re babies in the big scheme of things (even those of us with babies). Every now and again I freak out, but for the most part I think I am okay with it all. Maybe because I still get carded and I “appear” to be in my early twenties. I knew looking like a 12 year old would come in handy some day. haha However, I do every now and again think oh boy time keeps going and there is a lot of life to get in …
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Scared of Santa?





Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Sweet Vindication
Sweet...swt. Identifying information on whom the letters have been addressed to has been removed.
-Brad
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
Olbermann on Prop. 8
Saturday, November 8, 2008
Diarrhea of the Keyboard
I have returned to Our Favored Blog to see that Rog has taken over...in true Shock and Awe style. Good stuff.
Anybody have any predictions about Joe Lieberman's fate in the democratic caucus? Will his chairmanship be removed? Will he be booted from the caucus?
Will Missouri ever give up its electoral votes?
If you didn't hear, we here in MA had a question on the ballot to change possession of less than an ounce of marijuana into a civil charge rather than a criminal charge. I support the concept and voted for it. I was pretty sure that it would pass, despite the fact that literally every police chief and district attorney in the state came out against it. As it happened, not only did it pass, but by a 2-1 margin! Shocking! Way to go, Marijuanachusetts!
I did see that the assisted suicide (with a bunch of conditions) question was passed in Washington. Hmmm.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
O
He won. In the top three. Beat out three incumbents in terms of votes.
http://www.kypost.com/content/democracy2008/nkyelectionnews/story.aspx?content_id=4ba29cdc-ed12-4d8c-8c38-606affed02c6
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Yes we can.

Monday, November 3, 2008
Tomorrow's the Big Day...
Friday, October 31, 2008
Happy Halloween
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Planned economies, freedom, and redistribution of social goods
"Such is our present predicament: Capitalism leads to dole queues [read: unemployment and state subsistence], the scramble for markets, and war. Collectivism leads to concentration camps, leader worship, and war. There is no way out of this unless a planned economy can be combined with freedom of the intellect."
With this, Orwell hints at one of the ironies or contradictions of capitalism: markets have the capacity to destroy social bonds, thus containing the inherent potential to destroy their own stability; yet, markets at both the domestic and international levels also have the great capacity to integrate people.
Ignoring the equal (maybe even greater?) potential for self-inflicted destruction, many Adam Smith-centered libertarians trumpet markets solely as self-regulating forces for good, focusing only on the potential of markets to create peaceful orders that encourage mutual reliance and thus discipline, probity and honesty. Smith, however, proved himself overly utopian in his conception that both the economy and society could be protected from state penetration, could be left to reproduce unfettered, or that they would maintain social solidarity. Never mind the fact that modern capitalist markets depended from the start on the shaping and protecting activities of states. Never mind the fact that, in The Wealth of Nations, Smith himself stakes out a role for the government in defense, public works, education, and especially in the establishment of a framework of law. (For without such a system of justice, a market system is not possible.) Only Marx seems to have called for a total "withering away" of the state with his far-fetched idea of an enlightened proletariat organically developing a stateless society.
As we have seen from capitalism's previous cycles of boom and bust and the state's role in helping put the system upright again, the establishment of an economic order based solely on self-regulating markets (Smith's "invisible hand") are necessarily followed by the sucidal demise of these markets' self-regulation. This has been seen, perhaps most clearly, in the past several months of economic turmoil. The untamed market commits the sin of gluttony and eventually eats itself to death.
Ever since modernity's division of the human experience into state, economy, and society, the sight of ceaseless contestation has not been whether the state should have a role in our economy and society, but how it should do so, with what checks, and with what degree of mass participation and consent. For, as the state shapes and mitigates markets, it redefines the autonomy and flexibility of that market. And, importantly, it also opens up possibilities for self-conscious social engineering.
Our democratic system of government provides we, the people, with quite an honor and challenge to choose how we will redefine our markets and help shape our social system. I respect the conservative inclination to maintain what they believe are traditional methods of virtue, despite my great disagreement in our conceptions of virtuousness. I see the Republican party's virtues being centered on individual gain, self-interest (especially for those already empowered), and a reluctance for the government to use its potentially vast resources for social betterment. The values I see espoused in the Democratic party revolve around the idea that we're all in this together, by working together we make our whole greater than its sum, and that government can work to help make a more equitable and just society while maintaining social and intellectual freedoms.
The challenge, as Orwell states above, is to orchestrate a planned economy with the greatest degree of freedom. The idealist in me hopes, and even believes, that we're currently on that very path now. If so, it'll be amazingly ironic that the greatest government interventions in the history of our country (as obviously occurred over the past 8 years), were brought on by a right-wing, self-described "conservative" administration. Likewise, won't it be great if (when!?!) those state policies are scaled back in some cases by a so-called liberal Democrat, who then plans to redirected that state involvement toward a more just distribution of resources? After all, the purpose of taxes in our nation's history has always been to redistribute wealth and facilitate democratic state intervention. Whether the burden of payment falls on the struggling and disintegrating middle class (as it would if Bush's tax cuts became permanent, which McCain desires), or if the burden falls upon the rich who have a greater ability to shoulder such national responsibilities, tax redistribution always occurs with each year's necessary payment to our government.
I, as you know, favor Obama's policies of each of us helping each other out. That's the mixture of freedom and state intervention that I think can make "Morning in America" all over again.
